25 Responses to “The SECRET Cancer Cure & CONSPIRACY cover-up!”
on 06 Feb 2010 at 6:43 pm 1.xjih78 said …
Businesses fill a niche. No problems – no niches. Wake up, dude!
on 06 Feb 2010 at 6:56 pm 2.Waynedog1 said …
If you were any smarter, you still couldn’t be stupid. . . . but then again. . . . how do you tell a stupid person he’s stupid? It’s like telling a drunk he has a drinking problem. . .
on 06 Feb 2010 at 7:50 pm 3.KaosIndustries said …
The cure for cancer is stockpiled in a secret room along with the TV Set for the Moon Landing, along with the rifle that killed Kennedy and the 9/11 “missile” launch site. Nearby you find a field of the “special cows” that McDonalds grind up to make their mince, and there are also lots and lots of crashed spaceships.
And it is called Area 51a and it is guarded by a legion of leprechauns.
And also a racecar.
on 06 Feb 2010 at 8:01 pm 4.ih8v8s said …
ahahha go blunty gooooo!!!!
on 06 Feb 2010 at 8:43 pm 5.EssiacHempLaetrile said …
Proven in laboratory dishes but not willing to test on humans or animals!
A purified and concentrated form is RICK SIMPSON’S CANCER CURE HEMP OIL!!
on 06 Feb 2010 at 9:41 pm 6.EssiacHempLaetrile said …
THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
“More recently, scientists reported that cannabidiol, one of the chemicals found in marijuana, slows growth of breast cancer cells growing in laboratory dishes. However, this substance has not been tested in humans or even in animals that have cancer yet. Cannabidiol levels in marijuana are low, so any benefit from this compound would require use of a purified and concentrated form. “
on 06 Feb 2010 at 10:41 pm 7.theHFchannel said …
Chuck Norris’s tears cure cancer
on 06 Feb 2010 at 10:54 pm 8.Hezett said …
OIL of HEMP of GOOGLE RICK SIMPSON there& amp; #039; s your answer of cancer
on 06 Feb 2010 at 11:37 pm 9.itsianman said …
you can still sell a treatment n& #039; it imports that c& #039; thus sluice is people
on 06 Feb 2010 at 11:45 pm 10.erik15792 said …
There are now cure and you dont know what you are talking about. Either that or you are joking.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 12:06 am 11.iamnotapie said …
U. S =/= entire world
on 07 Feb 2010 at 12:36 am 12.rapandrnb said …
can you hate this guy, loll i love him, fucken funny cunt
on 07 Feb 2010 at 1:27 am 13.STARDOG4529 said …
wow are you people all that, it takes very little effort to find the cure its everywhere google cancer cure their are at least 10 diff methods of the cure for cancer. but somehow most of the m have been outlawed by the government . no conspiracy there . . lol my favorite one is hemp cure using hemp oil, already cured two cancers on my face with that. rick simpson has the most info on that subject, but i know 1st hand that hemp oil cures cancer i refused all doctors orders am now cancer free.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 1:56 am 14.finnaddict said …
*smiles*
I like this
on 07 Feb 2010 at 2:02 am 15.jules7890 said …
omg like I totally know that they already have a cure for cancer. They’re totally just not letting us have it! OMG OMG it’s a conspiracy
on 07 Feb 2010 at 2:41 am 16.jules7890 said …
yep ^_^
on 07 Feb 2010 at 3:21 am 17.nightseifer said …
lol, your such au-dessus-acteur
on 07 Feb 2010 at 3:26 am 18.robertkurt2 said …
The FDA says that only a drug can diagnose, treat, prevent or cure a disease and that makers of natural remedies cannot make the same claims. Why is this? Is it because of the lack of credible research into alternative medicine like we are told? No it is simply because you cannot put a legal patent on nature therefore there is no money (or very little) to be made in it.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 3:45 am 19.robertkurt2 said …
The FDA is supposed to be an unbiased regulatory body. Funny how a lot of individuals who worked for the FDA go to work for pharmaceutical companies after they retire from the FDA.
This is called a conflict of interest.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 4:35 am 20.robertkurt2 said …
Research money does not go to finding a cure it goes to paying for the patents on new drugs put out by Pharmaceutical companies.
Pharmaceutical companies have one fiduciary duty, increase profits for shareholders.
Funny we are not told that Cancer must be in an acidic environment to survive, will die in an oxygen rich alkaline environment and that people (like a good friend of mine) have cured themselves of cancer by simply converting their body PH to alkaline by the use of natural methods.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 4:50 am 21.Aerostoth said …
-continuation of above post-
Because of the IMPOSSIBILITY of pharmaceutical companies preventing cancer, “curing” cancer would be PROFITABLE.
Anyways, Blunty, I entirely agree with your logic. IF there was a cure for cancer now (which there isn’t), the various governments would not have the slightest chance of covering it up. If it got out, it would spread like wildfire.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 5:31 am 22.Aerostoth said …
Pharmaceutical companies would make a KILLING off of a cure for cancer. Why? Because there IS NO MARKETABLE cure. It can only be TREATED.
CANCER IS CAUSED FROM ABNORMALITIES IN EITHER DIET OR GENETICS. YOU EITHER FIX YOUR DIET, OR YOU “CURE” CANCER AFTER IT’S PRESENTED ITSELF.
Just because you “cure” it, doesn’t mean it won’t come back again because of genetics or your diet.
The only means of PREVENTING cancer is diet, and in some cases, genetics decides to screw you over anyway.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 6:09 am 23.happyrichie said …
what about electromagnetics, suicides have been correlated to power lines and have a look at us embassy in russia in the 70’s, russia abused usa’s em regulations.
what about chemtrails causing blood clots, morgellons disease?
on 07 Feb 2010 at 6:10 am 24.miketonon said …
People should be let to do what ever they feel is best in their situation. It is not up to the “government” (more specifically, the people that are really in power, which would be the wealthiest in the world) to control what we choose to do with our own bodies. This forceful intrusiveness is getting rediculous!
Everybody reading this, do what you please and if you find something that is said to be “quakery”, but works for you, share it! Most people will praise you for it!
on 07 Feb 2010 at 7:04 am 25.Blunty3000 said …
There is no such thing. The chemical some (ignorant) people call “vitamin b17″ is Amygdalin and aside from being poisionus in large enough quantities, has NEVER been shown in ANY properly conducted scientific study to have any curative properties on any type of cancer. I suggest YOU “look it up” and read more than psudoscience propoganda from quacks. Read about the properly conducted double blind scientific tests.
on 06 Feb 2010 at 6:43 pm 1.xjih78 said …
Businesses fill a niche. No problems – no niches. Wake up, dude!
on 06 Feb 2010 at 6:56 pm 2.Waynedog1 said …
If you were any smarter, you still couldn’t be stupid. . . . but then again. . . . how do you tell a stupid person he’s stupid? It’s like telling a drunk he has a drinking problem. . .
on 06 Feb 2010 at 7:50 pm 3.KaosIndustries said …
The cure for cancer is stockpiled in a secret room along with the TV Set for the Moon Landing, along with the rifle that killed Kennedy and the 9/11 “missile” launch site. Nearby you find a field of the “special cows” that McDonalds grind up to make their mince, and there are also lots and lots of crashed spaceships.
And it is called Area 51a and it is guarded by a legion of leprechauns.
And also a racecar.
on 06 Feb 2010 at 8:01 pm 4.ih8v8s said …
ahahha go blunty gooooo!!!!
on 06 Feb 2010 at 8:43 pm 5.EssiacHempLaetrile said …
Proven in laboratory dishes but not willing to test on humans or animals!
A purified and concentrated form is RICK SIMPSON’S CANCER CURE HEMP OIL!!
on 06 Feb 2010 at 9:41 pm 6.EssiacHempLaetrile said …
THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
“More recently, scientists reported that cannabidiol, one of the chemicals found in marijuana, slows growth of breast cancer cells growing in laboratory dishes. However, this substance has not been tested in humans or even in animals that have cancer yet. Cannabidiol levels in marijuana are low, so any benefit from this compound would require use of a purified and concentrated form. “
on 06 Feb 2010 at 10:41 pm 7.theHFchannel said …
Chuck Norris’s tears cure cancer
on 06 Feb 2010 at 10:54 pm 8.Hezett said …
OIL of HEMP of GOOGLE RICK SIMPSON there& amp; #039; s your answer of cancer
on 06 Feb 2010 at 11:37 pm 9.itsianman said …
you can still sell a treatment n& #039; it imports that c& #039; thus sluice is people
on 06 Feb 2010 at 11:45 pm 10.erik15792 said …
There are now cure and you dont know what you are talking about. Either that or you are joking.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 12:06 am 11.iamnotapie said …
U. S =/= entire world
on 07 Feb 2010 at 12:36 am 12.rapandrnb said …
can you hate this guy, loll i love him, fucken funny cunt
on 07 Feb 2010 at 1:27 am 13.STARDOG4529 said …
wow are you people all that, it takes very little effort to find the cure its everywhere google cancer cure their are at least 10 diff methods of the cure for cancer. but somehow most of the m have been outlawed by the government . no conspiracy there . . lol my favorite one is hemp cure using hemp oil, already cured two cancers on my face with that. rick simpson has the most info on that subject, but i know 1st hand that hemp oil cures cancer i refused all doctors orders am now cancer free.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 1:56 am 14.finnaddict said …
*smiles*
I like this
on 07 Feb 2010 at 2:02 am 15.jules7890 said …
omg like I totally know that they already have a cure for cancer. They’re totally just not letting us have it! OMG OMG it’s a conspiracy
on 07 Feb 2010 at 2:41 am 16.jules7890 said …
yep ^_^
on 07 Feb 2010 at 3:21 am 17.nightseifer said …
lol, your such au-dessus-acteur
on 07 Feb 2010 at 3:26 am 18.robertkurt2 said …
The FDA says that only a drug can diagnose, treat, prevent or cure a disease and that makers of natural remedies cannot make the same claims. Why is this? Is it because of the lack of credible research into alternative medicine like we are told? No it is simply because you cannot put a legal patent on nature therefore there is no money (or very little) to be made in it.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 3:45 am 19.robertkurt2 said …
The FDA is supposed to be an unbiased regulatory body. Funny how a lot of individuals who worked for the FDA go to work for pharmaceutical companies after they retire from the FDA.
This is called a conflict of interest.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 4:35 am 20.robertkurt2 said …
Research money does not go to finding a cure it goes to paying for the patents on new drugs put out by Pharmaceutical companies.
Pharmaceutical companies have one fiduciary duty, increase profits for shareholders.
Funny we are not told that Cancer must be in an acidic environment to survive, will die in an oxygen rich alkaline environment and that people (like a good friend of mine) have cured themselves of cancer by simply converting their body PH to alkaline by the use of natural methods.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 4:50 am 21.Aerostoth said …
-continuation of above post-
Because of the IMPOSSIBILITY of pharmaceutical companies preventing cancer, “curing” cancer would be PROFITABLE.
Anyways, Blunty, I entirely agree with your logic. IF there was a cure for cancer now (which there isn’t), the various governments would not have the slightest chance of covering it up. If it got out, it would spread like wildfire.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 5:31 am 22.Aerostoth said …
Pharmaceutical companies would make a KILLING off of a cure for cancer. Why? Because there IS NO MARKETABLE cure. It can only be TREATED.
CANCER IS CAUSED FROM ABNORMALITIES IN EITHER DIET OR GENETICS. YOU EITHER FIX YOUR DIET, OR YOU “CURE” CANCER AFTER IT’S PRESENTED ITSELF.
Just because you “cure” it, doesn’t mean it won’t come back again because of genetics or your diet.
The only means of PREVENTING cancer is diet, and in some cases, genetics decides to screw you over anyway.
on 07 Feb 2010 at 6:09 am 23.happyrichie said …
what about electromagnetics, suicides have been correlated to power lines and have a look at us embassy in russia in the 70’s, russia abused usa’s em regulations.
what about chemtrails causing blood clots, morgellons disease?
on 07 Feb 2010 at 6:10 am 24.miketonon said …
People should be let to do what ever they feel is best in their situation. It is not up to the “government” (more specifically, the people that are really in power, which would be the wealthiest in the world) to control what we choose to do with our own bodies. This forceful intrusiveness is getting rediculous!
Everybody reading this, do what you please and if you find something that is said to be “quakery”, but works for you, share it! Most people will praise you for it!
on 07 Feb 2010 at 7:04 am 25.Blunty3000 said …
There is no such thing. The chemical some (ignorant) people call “vitamin b17″ is Amygdalin and aside from being poisionus in large enough quantities, has NEVER been shown in ANY properly conducted scientific study to have any curative properties on any type of cancer. I suggest YOU “look it up” and read more than psudoscience propoganda from quacks. Read about the properly conducted double blind scientific tests.